Overview
Product details compiled from public sources, each with a citation.
Matrix Coverage
Where this product defends, by asset class and NIST CSF function. The Coverage column shows whether each asset is Primary, Secondary, or Adjacent to what the product does. The table omits empty rows and columns.
| Asset class | Identify | Protect | Detect | Coverage | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Coding and Orchestration Tools | Secondary | 4 | |||
| AI Model | Detect: Not covered | Primary | 2 |
Framework Relevance
These frameworks include controls relevant to the asset classes Jozu defends. This is an editorial inference from the AI Defense Matrix asset-level crossmap, not a statement that Jozu implements these controls or is certified against them.
Expand Collapse
| Framework | Asset class | Relevant controls |
|---|---|---|
| NIST IR 8596 | AI Coding and Orchestration Tools | Agents as deployed artifacts (orchestration view; see AI Agent Identities row for the principal view); system prompts and templates |
| AI Model | Models; Algorithms (model configuration) | |
| CSA AI Controls Matrix | AI Coding and Orchestration Tools | Application and Interface Security; Supply Chain Management |
| AI Model | Model Security; Governance, Risk and Compliance | |
| ISO 42001 | AI Coding and Orchestration Tools | A.6 AI system life cycle; A.5 Assessing impacts of AI systems |
| AI Model | A.6 AI system life cycle; A.10 Third-party and customer relationships; A.5 Assessing impacts of AI systems | |
| Google SAIF | AI Coding and Orchestration Tools | Secure the AI supply chain; application and pipeline security; agent orchestration controls |
| AI Model | Protect the AI model; ensure model integrity, provenance, and weight security | |
| SANS Critical AI Security Guidelines | AI Coding and Orchestration Tools | Secure Agentic Systems and AI Autonomy Controls (defined function scope; execution isolation; API and function-call gating); Limit Model Behavior (focused functionality; access controls outside the model) |
| AI Model | Conventional Security Controls (protect model parameters with least privilege, encryption at rest, runtime obfuscation, and trusted execution environments); Data/Model Engineering Controls (adversarial training; alignment and fine-tuning); AI Supply Chain Management (public-model caution; transfer-attack exposure) | |
| MITRE ATLAS | AI Coding and Orchestration Tools | AML.T0051 LLM Prompt Injection; AML.T0054 LLM Jailbreak; AML.T0016 Obtain Capabilities (malicious plugins) |
| AI Model | AML.T0043 Craft Adversarial Data; AML.T0024 Exfiltration via AI Inference API (subtechniques: AML.T0024.001 Invert AI Model and AML.T0024.002 Extract AI Model); AML.T0018 Manipulate AI Model (integrity and backdoor) | |
| OWASP AI Exchange | AI Coding and Orchestration Tools | Development-time threats: agent framework supply chain; runtime threats: plugin abuse, prompt injection via tools |
| AI Model | Development-time and runtime model threats: model inversion, extraction, evasion, poisoning | |
| OWASP LLM Top 10 | AI Coding and Orchestration Tools | LLM01 Prompt Injection; LLM05 Improper Output Handling; LLM07 System Prompt Leakage; LLM10 Unbounded Consumption |
| AI Model | LLM03 Supply Chain; LLM04 Data and Model Poisoning; LLM09 Misinformation | |
| OWASP Agentic Security Top 10 | AI Coding and Orchestration Tools | ASI01 Agent Goal Hijack; ASI02 Tool Misuse and Exploitation; ASI05 Unexpected Code Execution (RCE); ASI07 Insecure Inter-Agent Communication; ASI08 Cascading Failures; ASI10 Rogue Agents |
| AI Model | ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities (model provenance, weights, and dynamic loading) |
Provenance
Last sourced 2026-07-17.
Expand Collapse
Sources
- KitOps GitHub repository
- AI Supply Chain Security and Governance, Jozu
- “Models with critical CVEs, license conflicts, or missing signatures cannot deploy, eliminating the visibility and security gaps that cause production incidents.”
- Jozu homepage
- Jozu Agent Guard page
- “Jozu Hub scans every model, agent, and MCP server across nine vulnerability classes before any of it runs, and attaches the results to the artifact itself as signed attestations”
Changelog
-
Refreshed source citations and a coverage note.
-
Refreshed source links and quotes against the current vendor pages.
-
Updated a coverage note against the current vendor page.
-
Refreshed a coverage source against the updated vendor page.
-
Added to the catalog from the Jozu documentation.
Found an error? Corrections are welcome. Suggest an edit.