Cequence AI Gateway
Overview
Product details compiled from public sources, each with a citation.
Matrix Coverage
Where this product defends, by asset class and NIST CSF function. The Coverage column shows whether each asset is Primary, Secondary, or Adjacent to what the product does. The table omits empty rows and columns.
| Asset class | Protect | Detect | Coverage | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Gateways and Routers | Primary | 1 | ||
| AI Agent Identities | Detect: Not covered | Secondary | 1 |
Framework Relevance
These frameworks include controls relevant to the asset classes Cequence AI Gateway defends. This is an editorial inference from the AI Defense Matrix asset-level crossmap, not a statement that Cequence Security implements these controls or is certified against them.
Expand Collapse
| Framework | Asset class | Relevant controls |
|---|---|---|
| NIST IR 8596 | AI Gateways and Routers | AI data flows; APIs; inference endpoints (traffic side); model registries and dataset sources |
| AI Agent Identities | Agents as autonomous principals; Keys; Integrations and permissions | |
| CSA AI Controls Matrix | AI Gateways and Routers | Infrastructure Security; Interoperability and Portability |
| AI Agent Identities | IAM; Governance, Risk and Compliance | |
| ISO 42001 | AI Gateways and Routers | A.8 Information for interested parties; A.9 Use of AI systems; A.10 Third-party and customer relationships |
| AI Agent Identities | A.9 Use of AI systems; A.3 Internal organization; A.5 Assessing impacts of AI systems | |
| Google SAIF | AI Gateways and Routers | Harden and monitor infrastructure; network-level access and egress controls |
| AI Agent Identities | Focus on Agents (explicit SAIF section); identity, authorization, and delegation controls | |
| SANS Critical AI Security Guidelines | AI Gateways and Routers | Conventional Security Controls (authenticate and control access to inference APIs; API key management); Model I/O Handling (rate limiting; egress output filtering); Monitoring (interaction and API-usage logging) |
| AI Agent Identities | Secure Agentic Systems and AI Autonomy Controls (defined function scope; API and function-call gating; escalation and fallback); Limit Model Behavior (least-privilege focused functionality; human oversight; override capabilities) | |
| MITRE ATLAS | AI Gateways and Routers | AML.T0057 LLM Data Leakage; AML.T0024 Exfiltration via AI Inference API (network-side observation) |
| AI Agent Identities | AML.T0053 AI Agent Tool Invocation; credential and delegation-chain abuse | |
| OWASP AI Exchange | AI Gateways and Routers | Runtime threats: data leakage via AI egress; network-level access control gaps |
| AI Agent Identities | Runtime threats: unauthorized agent actions, capability abuse, delegation chain exploitation | |
| OWASP LLM Top 10 | AI Gateways and Routers | LLM10 Unbounded Consumption (cost and rate control); shadow AI egress and output handling |
| AI Agent Identities | LLM06 Excessive Agency; LLM05 Improper Output Handling; unauthorized actions by AI agents | |
| OWASP Agentic Security Top 10 | AI Gateways and Routers | ASI07 Insecure Inter-Agent Communication; ASI02 Tool Misuse and Exploitation (egress and tool-invocation scope); ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities (MCP and tool-registry trust) |
| AI Agent Identities | ASI03 Identity and Privilege Abuse; ASI10 Rogue Agents; ASI09 Human-Agent Trust Exploitation; ASI02 Tool Misuse and Exploitation (when tied to agent permissions) |
Provenance
Last sourced 2026-07-03.
Expand Collapse
Sources
- Cequence AI Gateway
- “The gateway enforces policy inline in the request path, for the full session, on every tool call.”
- “Built-in token lifecycle management provides appropriate identity-based access to systems and data while preventing unauthorized AI agent access.”
Changelog
-
Added to the catalog from the Cequence AI Gateway documentation.
Found an error? Corrections are welcome. Suggest an edit.